Bennett v. State
475 So. 2d 1033, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2246, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16080
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bennett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 438 So. 2d 1034 →
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Bennett’s motion for post-conviction relief. The points raised by Bennett in his motion are without merit. In the order, the trial court states that the basis for the motion is the same as that in an earlier motion for mitigation and reduction of sentence. That may be so, but the earlier motion was not attached to the order. Accordingly, we found it necessary to affirm on the merits of the cause. But cf. Morrison v. State, 453 So.2d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bennett v. State, 475 So. 2d 1033, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2246, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16080 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
475 So. 2d 1033 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morrison v. State
453 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)