Bennett v. State
227 So. 2d 692
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bennett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5028 →
Opinion
Among other contentions, defendant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny.
We have carefully reviewed the record and considered all of defendant’s arguments which we find to be devoid of merit.
Affirmed on the authority of Williams v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 446.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bennett v. State, 227 So. 2d 692 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
227 So. 2d 692 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
206 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)