Bennett v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Bennett v. State

10 So. 2d 431, 151 Fla. 771, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1264

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 13, 1942·Published

Opinion

*772 PER CURIAM:

This cause having been submitted to the Court upon oral argument and the briefs and the court having considered the entire record and being satisfied that the charge of the court was fair, full and complete; that the testimony amply sustains the verdict and that there was no reversible error committed in the trial of the case; it is our opinion and judgment that the sentence and judgment be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*772 PER CURIAM:

This cause having been submitted to the Court upon oral argument and the briefs and the court having considered the entire record and being satisfied that the charge of the court was fair, full and complete; that the testimony amply sustains the verdict and that there was no reversible error committed in the trial of the case; it is our opinion and judgment that the sentence and judgment be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Bennett v. State, 10 So. 2d 431, 151 Fla. 771, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1264 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

10 So. 2d 431 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.