Bennett v. Shelton
117 N.C. 103
Opinion
The plaintiff should have had his exception to the order making an additional party noted in the record, so that if he has suffered detriment thereby (which can rarely be the case) the order may be reviewed on appeal from the final judgment should it go against him. The appeal is premature and must be dismissed. Lane v. Richardson, 101 N. C., 181; Emry v. Parker, 111 N. C., 261.
Appeal Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bennett v. Shelton, 117 N.C. 103 (N.C. 1895).
117 N.C. 103 (Bennett v. Shelton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood v. City of Fayetteville
242 S.E.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
City of Raleigh v. Edwards
67 S.E.2d 669 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Barbee v. . Cannady
132 S.E. 572 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Joyner v. Champion Fiber Co.
101 S.E. 373 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
Bernard v. Shemwell.
52 S.E. 64 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)