Bennett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided June 15, 2022·No. 19-1963·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1963V Filed: May 20, 2022

* * * * * * * * * * * * * VIRGINIA BENNETT, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * Decision on Proffer; * Guillain Barre Syndrome (“GBS”); v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Richard Gage, Esq., Richard Gage, P.C, Cheyenne, WY for petitioner. Debra Begley, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master:

On December 27, 2019, Virginia Bennett [“Ms. Bennett or “petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges that she developed Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) after receiving an influenza vaccination on August 28, 2018. Petition at 1, ECF No. 1.

On October 23, 2020, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner satisfied the requirement necessary to qualify as a Table Injury under the Vaccine Injury Table. See ECF No. 25.

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

1 On November 9, 2020, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a Table Injury of GBS following the flu vaccine she received on August 28, 2018. ECF No. 26.

Respondent filed a proffer on May 20, 2022, agreeing to issue the following payments:

A lump sum of $477,977.93, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($142,603.46), pain and suffering ($250,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($85,374.47), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Virginia Bennett.

An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in Section II.B. of the Proffer attached.

These foregoing amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

Proffer, ECF No. 51.

I adopt the parties’ proffer hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 \

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

************************************* VIRGINIA BENNETT, * * Petitioner, * No. 19-1963V * SPECIAL MASTER ROTH v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * *************************************

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On December 27, 2019, Virginia Bennett (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation

under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34

(“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) resulting

from an influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on August 28, 2018. Petition at 1-2. On

October 23, 2020, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed his Rule 4(c)

Report conceding that petitioner satisfies the requirements necessary to qualify as a Table injury

under the Vaccine Injury Table. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-14(a)(XIV)(D), (c)(15). See ECF No. 25.

On November 9, 2020, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that

petitioner is entitled to vaccine compensation for a Table injury of GBS following the influenza

vaccine she received on August 28, 2018. ECF No. 26.

I. Items of Compensation

Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner receive an award as

follows: A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CNLCP, CCM, and

petitioner engaged rehabilitation counselors Elizabeth Kattman, B.S., M.S., and Helen M.

Woodard, M.A., to provide an estimation of petitioner’s future vaccine-injury related needs. For

the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related” is as described in the respondent’s Rule

4(c) Report. All items of compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the

evidence, and are illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for

Virginia Bennett, attached hereto as Tab A. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be

awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart

attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.

B. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $250,000.00 in actual pain and

suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

C. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable

expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be

awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $85,374.47. Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made

through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below,

and request that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:1

1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.

2 A. A lump sum payment of $477,977.93, representing compensation for life care

expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($142,603.46), pain and

suffering ($250,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($85,374.47) in the form of a check

payable to petitioner, Virginia Bennett.

B. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract,2 subject to the conditions

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2022).

Bennett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Bennett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-14
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-14(a)(XIV)(D)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a