Bennett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
This text of Bennett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Bennett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-1426V Filed: October 27, 2016 UNPUBLISHED
**************************** MARCELLA BENNETT, * * Petitioner, * * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; v. * Influenza Vaccine (“Flu Vaccine”); * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration (“SIRVA”); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) * Respondent. * * **************************** Robert Bates, III, Law Offices of Tony Seaton, PLLC, Johnson City, TN, for petitioner. Glenn MacLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On November 24, 2015, Marcella Bennett (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered “injuries, including left shoulder injuries, rotator cuff impingement and partial tear of the anterior supraspinatus tendon, resulting from adverse effects of a [sic] influenza vaccination received on December 5, 2012.” Petition at 1; accord. Petition at ¶¶ 1-5, 8. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On April 4, 2016, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. (ECF No. 29). On October 27, 2016, respondent
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $125,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Marcella Bennett. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
************************* * MARCELLA BENNETT, * * Petitioner, * * v. * No. 15-1426V (ECF) * CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER * NORA BETH DORSEY SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * *************************
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On April 4, 2016, the Chief Special Master found that a preponderance of the medical
evidence indicates that petitioner suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
(“SIRVA”), which was causally related to the influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on
December 5, 2012. The parties now address the amount of compensation to be awarded in this
case.
I. Items of Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
$125,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be
entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses and future pain and suffering. II. Form of the Award
Petitioner is a competent adult. Accordingly, the parties recommend that the
compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of
$125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES Acting Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
LYNN E. RICCIARDELLA Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/ GLENN A. MACLEOD GLENN A. MACLEOD Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel.: (202) 616-4122
DATE: October 27, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bennett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2017.