Bennett v. Rockrose Development Corp.
This text of 480 N.E.2d 383 (Bennett v. Rockrose Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (106 AD2d 256). Plaintiffs’ constitutional challenge to the retroactive application of revised Real Property Law § 226-b was considered and rejected in Vance v Century Apts. Assoc. (61 NY2d 716). (See also, Blum v West End Assoc., 64 NY2d 939.)
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
480 N.E.2d 383, 64 N.Y.2d 1155, 490 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-rockrose-development-corp-ny-1985.