Bennett v. Rockrose Development Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Bennett v. Rockrose Development Corp.

480 N.E.2d 383, 64 N.Y.2d 1155, 490 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15860

New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 2, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (106 AD2d 256). Plaintiffs’ constitutional challenge to the retroactive application of revised Real Property Law § 226-b was considered and rejected in Vance v Century Apts. Assoc. (61 NY2d 716). (See also, Blum v West End Assoc., 64 NY2d 939.)

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (106 AD2d 256). Plaintiffs’ constitutional challenge to the retroactive application of revised Real Property Law § 226-b was considered and rejected in Vance v Century Apts. Assoc. (61 NY2d 716). (See also, Blum v West End Assoc., 64 NY2d 939.)

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Bennett v. Rockrose Development Corp., 480 N.E.2d 383, 64 N.Y.2d 1155, 490 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15860 (N.Y. 1985).

Pincite

480 N.E.2d 383 (Bennett v. Rockrose Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related