Bennett v. Roberts
This text of 257 A.D. 1098 (Bennett v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders of June eighth and June tenth and order of June thirteenth so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (The orders grant plaintiff’s motion for substitution of Ransom Pratt as relator in the place of Corning Bar Association, deny defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and grant plaintiff’s motion for an examination of witnesses before trial [1099]*1099and deny application to examine defendant and his records, in an injunction action to restrain defendant from the claimed practice of law without a license.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 A.D. 1098, 14 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-roberts-nyappdiv-1939.