Bennett v. Orchard

134 A. 519, 4 N.J. Misc. 807, 1926 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 72
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided September 23, 1926·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Backes, Y. C.

The bill is in the usual form, to foreclose a mortgage by a married woman in which her husband did not join. The document is ineffective as a mortgage lien and incapable of foreclosure. Realty Title and Mortgage Co. v. Schaaf, 81 N. J. Eq. 115.

The mortgage was given to secure a pre-existing debt, and does not come within the principle of the cited cases that a lien will be declared and enforced against the separate estate of a married woman for a debt contracted by her on the credit of her estate, and which she intended to charge therewith by the mortgage sought to be foreclosed.

Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. Orchard, 134 A. 519, 4 N.J. Misc. 807, 1926 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 72 (N.J. Ct. App. 1926).

134 A. 519 (Bennett v. Orchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaffitz v. Clawson
36 A.2d 215 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Dreier v. Pomeroy
146 A. 178 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)