Bennett v. OFFICEMAX, INC.
This text of 730 N.W.2d 737 (Bennett v. OFFICEMAX, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William E. BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OFFICEMAX, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 29, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., states as follows:
I would deny leave to appeal and assess $250 in costs against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant under MCR 7.316(D)(1) for filing a vexatious appeal. I would also bar plaintiff from submitting additional filings in this Court until he offers proof that he has paid all outstanding court-imposed sanctions. By letter to the Clerk of this Court dated February 18, 2007, plaintiff has indicated that he may not pay sanctions imposed by this Court and the lower courts in prior cases.
CORRIGAN, J., joins the statement of MARKMAN, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
730 N.W.2d 737, 478 Mich. 851, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-officemax-inc-mich-2007.