Bennett v. Mortgage Service Corp.

173 S.E. 22, 206 N.C. 902, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 343
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 28, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 173 S.E. 22 (Bennett v. Mortgage Service Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Mortgage Service Corp., 173 S.E. 22, 206 N.C. 902, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 343 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appears from the verified pleadings in this action that there is a bona fide controversy between the parties (1) as to whether the notes executed by the plaintiffs and secured in the deed of trust containing the power of sale under which the defendants have advertised the land described therein for sale, are now due, and (2) if said notes are now due, because of default by plaintiffs in paying installments thereon, as to the amount now due on said note. For this reason, the temporary restraining order was properly continued to the hearing. Parker Co. v. Bank, 200 N. C., 441, 157 S. E., 419.

The validity of chapter 74, as amended by chapter 525, Public-Local Laws of North Carolina, 1933, is not presented by this appeal.

The judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the right of the defendants to move for the appointment of a receiver in this action, as provided by statute. C. S., 859.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial National Bank
157 S.E. 419 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 S.E. 22, 206 N.C. 902, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-mortgage-service-corp-nc-1934.