Bennett v. McFadden
This text of 61 Ill. 334 (Bennett v. McFadden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where the court, ujion a motion made to dissolve an injunction for want of equity in the bill, sustains the motion, dissolves the injunction and dismisses the bill, the allegations of the bill are to be taken as true, the same as upon a demurrer. The matters alleged in the bill in this case bring it within the principle of the ease of Christie et al. v. Hale, 46 Ill. 117.
The court below erred in dissolving the injunction-and dismissing the bill for want of equity, and the decree must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Decree reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 Ill. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-mcfadden-ill-1871.