Bennett v. Lehr

23 Fla. Supp. 2d 182
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1987
DocketCase No. 86-282 AP (County Court Case No. 86-0318SP05)
StatusPublished

This text of 23 Fla. Supp. 2d 182 (Bennett v. Lehr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Lehr, 23 Fla. Supp. 2d 182 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1987).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The sole point on appeal challenges the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees under Section 57.105 Florida Statutes (1979). We reverse upon the holding that the position asserted by the defendant below was not frivolous —that is, entirely devoid of even arguable substance — as is required to invoke the statute. Sheriff of Alachua County v. Hardie, 433 So.2d 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); City ofDeerfield Beach v. Oliver Hoffman Corp., 396 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Allen v. Dutton’s Estate, 384 So.2d 171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

The judgment awarding attorney’s fees is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allen v. Estate of Dutton
384 So. 2d 171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Sheriff of Alachua County v. Hardie
433 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
City of Deerfield Beach v. Oliver-Hoffman Corp.
396 So. 2d 1187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Fla. Supp. 2d 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-lehr-flacirct-1987.