Bennett v. KISSING BRIDGE CORPORATION
836 N.E.2d 1144, 5 N.Y.3d 812, 803 N.Y.S.2d 22
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (17 AD3d 990).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bennett v. KISSING BRIDGE CORPORATION, 836 N.E.2d 1144, 5 N.Y.3d 812, 803 N.Y.S.2d 22 (N.Y. 2005).
836 N.E.2d 1144 (Bennett v. KISSING BRIDGE CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DeMulder v. Hunter Mtn. Ski Bowl, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 06097 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Festa v. Apex Capital, LLC
2019 NY Slip Op 2853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
DAILEY, ADAM v. LABRADOR DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Dailey v. Labrador Development Corp.
136 A.D.3d 1380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Clarke v. Peek 'N Peak Recreation, Inc.
551 F. Supp. 2d 159 (W.D. New York, 2008)
Goldberg v. Tracy
247 F.R.D. 360 (E.D. New York, 2008)
Sontag v. Holiday Valley, Inc.
38 A.D.3d 1350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)