Bennett v. Kelly

251 A.D.2d 776, 674 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6759
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 1998·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

White, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), entered July 21, 1997 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

After being released on parole supervision on April 16, 1987, petitioner was arrested on July 2, 1987. Next, on July 7, 1987, he received a notice of parole violation for failure to report and waived his right to a preliminary parole violation hearing. After petitioner refused to attend several scheduled final revocation hearings, one was held in absentia on November 10, 1987 that resulted in a decision by the Parole Board on December 21, 1987 revoking petitioner’s parole. Subsequently, defendant was convicted of several felony offenses and sentenced on March 1, 1989 to an indeterminate prison sentence of 71/2 to 15 years.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the December 1987 parole revocation determination on the ground that he was denied due process because he was never provided with notice of the Board’s determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

We affirm on a different ground than that expressed by Supreme Court. Petitioner’s parole was automatically revoked in March 1989 without a hearing by operation of law upon his new felony conviction and indeterminate sentence (see, Executive Law § 259-i [3] [d] [iii]; see also, People ex rel. Harris v Sullivan, 74 NY2d 305, 308; People ex rel. Ward v Russi, 219 AD2d 862, lv denied 87 NY2d 803; Matter of Bonilla v Russi, 210 AD2d 828). Therefore, since this revocation superseded the one made in December 1987, any determination of this proceeding by Supreme Court would not have had any impact on the rights or respective positions of the parties and the petition should have been dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Griffin v Rodriguez, 187 AD2d 591).

Yesawich Jr., Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. Kelly, 251 A.D.2d 776, 674 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

251 A.D.2d 776 (Bennett v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Mack v. Warden
55 A.D.3d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Welch v. Travis
292 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People ex rel. Williams v. McCoy
278 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Adams v. New York State Division of Parole
278 A.D.2d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People ex rel. Seay v. Gipson
274 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Ward v. Goord
272 A.D.2d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People ex rel. Cook v. Leonardo
271 A.D.2d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People ex rel. Tyler v. Senkowski
271 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)