Bennett v. Hospice & Palliative Care Center of Alamance-Caswell

787 S.E.2d 374, 368 N.C. 917, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 488
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 9, 2016·No. 116P16·Published

Opinion

1. Pit’s Pro Se Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-667)

1. Dismissed ex mero motu

2. Pit’s Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

2. Denied

3. Def’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Dismissed as moot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. Hospice & Palliative Care Center of Alamance-Caswell, 787 S.E.2d 374, 368 N.C. 917, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 488 (N.C. 2016).

787 S.E.2d 374 (Bennett v. Hospice & Palliative Care Center of Alamance-Caswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31