Bennett v. Holmes

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Bennett v. Holmes

7 A. 902, 79 Me. 51, 1887 Me. LEXIS 13

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided February 3, 1887·Published

Opinion

Haskell, J.

It is settled law in this state, that an indorsement of a writ as follows, "No. 262. From the office of J. W. Mitchell,” is sufficient. Jacobs v. Benson, 39 Maine, 132; Richards v. McKenney, 43 Maine, 177 ; Sawtelle v. Wardwell, 56 Maine, 146. The indorsement in Gilmore v. Crosby, 76 Maine, 599, was in different form.

Exceptions overruled.

Peters, C. J., Walton, Virgin, Libbey and Emery, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haskell, J.

It is settled law in this state, that an indorsement of a writ as follows, "No. 262. From the office of J. W. Mitchell,” is sufficient. Jacobs v. Benson, 39 Maine, 132; Richards v. McKenney, 43 Maine, 177 ; Sawtelle v. Wardwell, 56 Maine, 146. The indorsement in Gilmore v. Crosby, 76 Maine, 599, was in different form.

Exceptions overruled.

Peters, C. J., Walton, Virgin, Libbey and Emery, JJ., concurred.

Bennett v. Holmes, 7 A. 902, 79 Me. 51, 1887 Me. LEXIS 13 (Me. 1887).

Pincite

7 A. 902 (Bennett v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.