Bennett v. Holmes

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Bennett v. Holmes

7 A. 902, 79 Me. 51, 1887 Me. LEXIS 13

DecidedFebruary 3, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A. 902 (Bennett v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett v. Holmes, 7 A. 902, 79 Me. 51, 1887 Me. LEXIS 13 (Me. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Haskell, J.

It is settled law in this state, that an indorsement of a writ as follows, "No. 262. From the office of J. W. Mitchell,” is sufficient. Jacobs v. Benson, 39 Maine, 132; Richards v. McKenney, 43 Maine, 177 ; Sawtelle v. Wardwell, 56 Maine, 146. The indorsement in Gilmore v. Crosby, 76 Maine, 599, was in different form.

Exceptions overruled.

Peters, C. J., Walton, Virgin, Libbey and Emery, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haskell, J.

It is settled law in this state, that an indorsement of a writ as follows, "No. 262. From the office of J. W. Mitchell,” is sufficient. Jacobs v. Benson, 39 Maine, 132; Richards v. McKenney, 43 Maine, 177 ; Sawtelle v. Wardwell, 56 Maine, 146. The indorsement in Gilmore v. Crosby, 76 Maine, 599, was in different form.

Exceptions overruled.

Peters, C. J., Walton, Virgin, Libbey and Emery, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A. 902, 79 Me. 51, 1887 Me. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-holmes-me-1887.