Bennett v. Hendricks

102 S.E. 467, 25 Ga. App. 13, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 551
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1920
Docket10837
StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 467 (Bennett v. Hendricks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Hendricks, 102 S.E. 467, 25 Ga. App. 13, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 551 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Luke, J.

It appearing, from the uncontradieted certificate of tlie clerk of the city court, in the record, that this ease has been settled between the parties, the questions raised in the bill of exceptions are moot, and the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 467, 25 Ga. App. 13, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-hendricks-gactapp-1920.