Bennett v. Harford Cty.

483 Md. 414
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 5, 2023
Docket38pc/22
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 483 Md. 414 (Bennett v. Harford Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Harford Cty., 483 Md. 414 (Md. 2023).

Opinion

Circuit Court for Harford County Case No. C-12-CV-22-000857 IN THE SUPREME COURT Argued: April 4, 2023 OF MARYLAND*

No. 38

September Term, 2022

______________________________________

JACOB BENNETT

V.

HARFORD COUNTY, MARYLAND

Fader, C.J., Watts, Hotten, Booth, Biran, Gould, Eaves,

JJ. Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials ______________________________________ Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2023-04-05 09:08-04:00 PER CURIAM ORDER ______________________________________

Filed: April 5, 2023 Gregory Hilton, Clerk

* At the November 8, 2022 general election, the voters of Maryland ratified a constitutional amendment changing the name of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to the Supreme Court of Maryland. The name change took effect on December 14, 2022. * IN THE * JACOB BENNETT SUPREME COURT * v. OF MARYLAND * HARFORD COUNTY, MARYLAND No. 38 * September Term, 2022 *

PER CURIAM ORDER Upon consideration of the filings by Jacob Bennett, the appellant, and Harford

County, Maryland, the appellee, and oral argument conducted on April 4, 2023,

Whereas, Mr. Bennett is a teacher in Harford County Public Schools and is in the

employ of the Harford County Board of Education; and

Whereas, in the 2022 General Election for Harford County Council Members,

Mr. Bennett won election to serve as the Councilmember for District F; and

Whereas, on December 9, 2022, Harford County brought suit in the Circuit Court

for Harford County seeking a declaratory judgment that Mr. Bennett is not qualified to

serve on the Harford County Council while employed as a teacher by the Harford County

Board of Education and an injunction barring him from serving on the Council; and

Whereas, on December 21, 2022, Mr. Bennett answered the County’s complaint,

contending that he is not an employee of the County or of the State, but of the County

Board of Education; and

Whereas, on the same day, Mr. Bennett filed a counter-claim against the County,

seeking injunctive relief enjoining the County from preventing him from being a member of the County Council, a writ of mandamus requiring the County to onboard him, and

declaratory relief establishing that § 207 of the Harford County Charter does not disqualify

him from serving as a Member of the County Council by virtue of him working for the

County Board of Education as a public school teacher; and

Whereas, Section 207 of the Harford County Charter provides, in relevant part:

“During the term of office, the Council member shall not hold any other office of profit or

employment in the government of the State of Maryland, Harford County, or any

municipality within Harford County”; and

Whereas, on February 15, 2023, after a hearing, the circuit court ruled that Section

207 and the doctrine of incompatible positions precluded Mr. Bennett from serving on the

Harford County Council while employed as a teacher by the Harford County Board of

Education. On the same day, the circuit court entered a declaratory judgment and order in

which it: (1) declared that Section 207 “applies to public school teachers employed by the

Harford County Board of Education”; (2) declared that Mr. Bennett, due to his employment

with the Harford County Board of Education, “is not qualified to be a member of the

Harford County Council”; (3) ordered Mr. Bennett to “cure his lack of qualification . . . by

terminating his employment with the Harford County Board of Education”; and

(4) enjoined Mr. Bennett from acting as a member of the Harford County Council “unless

and until he cures his lack of qualification”; and

Whereas, Mr. Bennett noted an appeal from the circuit court’s judgment and

thereafter sought review in this Court by filing a petition for writ of certiorari, which this

Court granted; and

2 Whereas, the parties jointly moved for expedited consideration of this matter, which

this Court also granted; and

Whereas, on April 4, 2023, this Court held oral argument,

Now, therefore, for reasons to be stated later in an opinion to be filed, it is this 5th

day of April, 2023, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring,

ORDERED, that the Declaratory Judgment and Order issued by the Circuit Court

for Harford County on February 15, 2023 is hereby REVERSED; and it is further

ORDERED, that neither Section 207 of the Harford County Charter nor the doctrine

of incompatible positions precludes Mr. Bennett from serving as a member of the Harford

County Council while simultaneously being employed as a teacher by the Harford County

Board of Education; and it is further

ORDERED, that this case is remanded to the Circuit Court for Harford County for

entry of: (1) a declaratory judgment that Mr. Bennett is qualified to serve as a member of

the Harford County Council while simultaneously being employed as a teacher by the

Harford County Board of Education; and (2) any injunctive relief that may be necessary

and appropriate to implement and enforce that declaratory relief; and it is further

ORDERED, that costs are to be paid by Harford County and the mandate is to issue

forthwith.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bennett v. Harford County
Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
483 Md. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-harford-cty-md-2023.