Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bennett v. Dempsey & Goldsmith, P.A.

Bennett v. Dempsey & Goldsmith, P.A.

625 So. 2d 1324, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11172, 1993 WL 452668
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 5, 1993
DocketNo. 92-3091
StatusPublished

This text of 625 So. 2d 1324 (Bennett v. Dempsey & Goldsmith, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Dempsey & Goldsmith, P.A., 625 So. 2d 1324, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11172, 1993 WL 452668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The default must be set aside and the corresponding final judgment predicated thereupon vacated because the defendant served a responsive pleading on the same day the default was entered. See Nasrallah v. Smith, 538 So.2d 554 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Roche v. Commercial Technical Consultants Co., 534 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

REVERSED.

HARRIS, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nasrallah v. Smith
538 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Roche v. COMMERCIAL TECH. CONSULT. CO.
534 So. 2d 1243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 So. 2d 1324, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11172, 1993 WL 452668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-dempsey-goldsmith-pa-fladistctapp-1993.