Bennett v. Cuomo

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 4, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-07846·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CHARLOTTE BENNETT,

Plaintiff, 22-CV-07846-VSB

v.

STIPULATED ANDREW M. CUOMO, CONFIDENTIALITY MELISSA DEROSA, AGREEMENT AND JILL DESROSIERS, and PROTECTIVE ORDER JUDITH MOGUL,

Defendants.

VERNON S. BRODERICK, District Judge: WHEREAS, all of the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties” and each individually, a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and sensitive information that may need to be disclosed in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties to this action, their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, any other person in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, and all other persons with actual notice of this Order will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: 1. With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action, including information produced or 1 disclosed by a nonparty pursuant to a subpoena) that a person has designated as “Confidential” pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder. 2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (each, a “Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it

reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) previously non-disclosed financial information; (b) any information of a sensitive personal nature regarding any individual; or (c) any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after the date of this Order. 3. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing

for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential information redacted. 4. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, or (b) notifying the reporter and counsel of record, in writing, within 10 days after a deposition has concluded, of the information to be designated “Confidential.” 5. If at any time before trial of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously 2 produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by notifying all Parties in writing. Thereafter, all persons subject to this Order will treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential. In addition, the Producing Party shall provide each other Party with replacement versions of such Discovery Material that bears the “Confidential” designation within two business days of providing such notice.

6. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. 7. The production of privileged or protected material by a Producing Party shall not be deemed a waiver or an impairment of any claim or privilege or protection, including the attorney-client, law enforcement, and deliberative process privileges and the work-product doctrine, as to the material produced or as to the subject matter thereof. a. In the event a Producing Party discovers a production of privileged and/or

protected material, the Producing Party shall notify counsel to each party who received the production (“Receiving Party”) in writing and identify the privileged or protected material by Bates number or other identifying mark. Upon receipt of a notice of disclosure, each Receiving Party must refrain from using such material in any way, and must promptly return, sequester, or destroy it. To the extent there is a disagreement regarding the proper disposition of the material, each Receiving Party shall refrain from using the material unless and until the court makes a determination as to its proper disposition. b. In the event a Receiving Party believes that the Producing Party produced privileged or protected material, the Receiving Party shall notify the Producing Party and each 3 other Receiving Party in writing and identify the suspected privileged or protected material by Bates number or other identifying mark within ten business days of such discovery. Once a Receiving Party believes that there has been a disclosure of privileged or protected material, the Receiving Party must refrain from using such material in any way, and must promptly return, sequester, or destroy it. To the extent there is a disagreement regarding the proper disposition of

the material, each Receiving Party shall continue to refrain from using the material unless and until the Court makes a determination as to its proper disposition. 8. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons: (a) the Parties to this action, their insurers, and counsel to their insurers; (b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter;

(c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter; (d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (e) as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy;

4 (f) any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (g) any person a Party retains to serve as an expert witness or otherwise provide

specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (h) stenographers engaged to transcribe depositions the Parties conduct in this action; and (i) this Court, including any appellate court, its support personnel, and court reporters. 9. Before disclosing any Confidential Discovery Material to any person referred to in subparagraphs 8(d), 8(f), or 8(g) above, counsel must provide a copy of this Order

to such person. 10. This Order binds the Parties and certain others to treat as Confidential any Discovery Materials so classified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. Cuomo, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Bennett v. Cuomo (Bennett v. Cuomo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)