Home/Supreme Court/Bennett v. Cottingham

Bennett v. Cottingham

393 U.S. 317, 89 S. Ct. 554, 21 L. Ed. 2d 513, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2861
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 13, 1969
Docket665
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 393 U.S. 317 (Bennett v. Cottingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Cottingham, 393 U.S. 317, 89 S. Ct. 554, 21 L. Ed. 2d 513, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2861 (1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Briggs
388 A.2d 507 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)
Callahan v. Sanders
339 F. Supp. 814 (M.D. Alabama, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
393 U.S. 317, 89 S. Ct. 554, 21 L. Ed. 2d 513, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-cottingham-scotus-1969.