Bennett v. Cottingham

393 U.S. 317, 89 S. Ct. 554, 21 L. Ed. 2d 513, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2861
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 13, 1969·No. 665·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. Cottingham, 393 U.S. 317, 89 S. Ct. 554, 21 L. Ed. 2d 513, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2861 (1969).

393 U.S. 317 (Bennett v. Cottingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Briggs
388 A.2d 507 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)
Callahan v. Sanders
339 F. Supp. 814 (M.D. Alabama, 1971)