Bennett v. COOK CHEVROLET-PONTIAC-OLDSMOBILE-BUICK, INC.

725 N.W.2d 470, 477 Mich. 992, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 59
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 12, 2007·No. 132153·Published

Opinion

725 N.W.2d 470 (2007)

William E. BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Luise K. BENNETT, Plaintiff,
v.
COOK CHEVROLET-PONTIAC-OLDSMOBILE-BUICK, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 132153. COA No. 268980.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 12, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. Costs of $250 are assessed against the plaintiff-appellant in favor of the defendant-appellee under MCR 7.316(D)(1) for filing a vexatious appeal.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would not assess costs because insufficient evidence exists that the appeal was vexatious.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. COOK CHEVROLET-PONTIAC-OLDSMOBILE-BUICK, INC., 725 N.W.2d 470, 477 Mich. 992, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 59 (Mich. 2007).

725 N.W.2d 470 (Bennett v. COOK CHEVROLET-PONTIAC-OLDSMOBILE-BUICK, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oesterle v. Wallace
725 N.W.2d 470 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2006)