Bennett v. Christopher Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bennett v. Christopher Realty Corp.

13 A.D.2d 916, 216 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10341

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 916 (Bennett v. Christopher Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett v. Christopher Realty Corp., 13 A.D.2d 916, 216 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on January 5, 1961 granting plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of his application for a preference, under subdivision 5 of rule V of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, and upon reconsideration, adhering to the original decision denying a preference, unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion for a. preference granted, with $10 costs. On the record before us, a preference was warranted under the rule. The appeal from the order entered October 6, 1960 is dismissed. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on January 5, 1961 granting plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of his application for a preference, under subdivision 5 of rule V of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, and upon reconsideration, adhering to the original decision denying a preference, unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion for a. preference granted, with $10 costs. On the record before us, a preference was warranted under the rule. The appeal from the order entered October 6, 1960 is dismissed. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 916, 216 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-christopher-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1961.