Bennett v. Chemo Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bennett v. Chemo Co.

263 A.D. 1063, 35 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8058

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 1063 (Bennett v. Chemo Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett v. Chemo Co., 263 A.D. 1063, 35 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Order dated April 4, 1941, made on the plaintiff’s motion to examine the defendant, modified by striking from paragraph (4) of the notice of motion the words “ as well as how it was used and how it was stored.” Order dated April 4, 1941, [1064]*1064so far as appealed from, made on the plaintiff’s motion to modify the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars, is amended so as to include, in subdivision (1) of said order, paragraph (21) of the defendant’s demand. Said orders, as modified and amended, and the order dated May 2, 1941, are affirmed, without costs of these appeals to either party. All concur. (Two orders grant in part plaintiff’s motion to modify defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars and for an examination of defendant before trial. The third order grants in certain particulars plaintiff’s motion to vacate defendant’s notice of examination before trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dated April 4, 1941, made on the plaintiff’s motion to examine the defendant, modified by striking from paragraph (4) of the notice of motion the words “ as well as how it was used and how it was stored.” Order dated April 4, 1941, [1064]*1064so far as appealed from, made on the plaintiff’s motion to modify the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars, is amended so as to include, in subdivision (1) of said order, paragraph (21) of the defendant’s demand. Said orders, as modified and amended, and the order dated May 2, 1941, are affirmed, without costs of these appeals to either party. All concur. (Two orders grant in part plaintiff’s motion to modify defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars and for an examination of defendant before trial. The third order grants in certain particulars plaintiff’s motion to vacate defendant’s notice of examination before trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 1063, 35 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-chemo-co-nyappdiv-1942.