Bennett v. C. I. T. Corp.
1 S.E.2d 76, 59 Ga. App. 427, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 49
Opinion
An attachment bond signed John Doe, agent or attorney at law for Richard Roe, is amendable, by allowing the bond to be signed Richard Roe, by his agent or attorney at law, John Doe. Long v. Hood, 46 Ga. 225; Whitley v. Jackson, 34 Ga. App. 286 (6) (129 S. E. 662), and cit. The court did not err in allowing the amendment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bennett v. C. I. T. Corp., 1 S.E.2d 76, 59 Ga. App. 427, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 49 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).
1 S.E.2d 76 (Bennett v. C. I. T. Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Long v. Hood
46 Ga. 225 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1872)
Whitley v. Jackson
129 S.E. 662 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)