Bennett v. Buckley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Bennett v. Buckley

258 S.W.2d 448, 1953 Ky. LEXIS 822

DecidedMay 22, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 258 S.W.2d 448 (Bennett v. Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett v. Buckley, 258 S.W.2d 448, 1953 Ky. LEXIS 822 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On motion for an appeal from the Fay-ette Circuit Court, Joseph J. Bradley, Judge.

Roy T. Bennett and A. D. Robinson, d/b/a Main Auto Sales, who were plaintiffs in the circuit court, prayed judgment against Ben F. Buckley, Jr., and Ben F. Buckley III, d/b/a Buckley and Company, in the sum of $1,700. At the trial of the cause and at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ testimony, the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the defendants. The jury returned a verdict in accordance with the instruction, and plaintiffs’ petition was dismissed.

The case is reviewable by motion for an appeal under Chapter 24 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1952, which became effective June 19, 1952.

We have examined the case carefully and are not disposed to disturb the judgment. Therefore, it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On motion for an appeal from the Fay-ette Circuit Court, Joseph J. Bradley, Judge.

Roy T. Bennett and A. D. Robinson, d/b/a Main Auto Sales, who were plaintiffs in the circuit court, prayed judgment against Ben F. Buckley, Jr., and Ben F. Buckley III, d/b/a Buckley and Company, in the sum of $1,700. At the trial of the cause and at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ testimony, the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the defendants. The jury returned a verdict in accordance with the instruction, and plaintiffs’ petition was dismissed.

The case is reviewable by motion for an appeal under Chapter 24 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1952, which became effective June 19, 1952.

We have examined the case carefully and are not disposed to disturb the judgment. Therefore, it is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 S.W.2d 448, 1953 Ky. LEXIS 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-buckley-kyctapp-1953.