Bennett v. Bay View Bank

172 F. App'x 486
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2006·No. No. 05-2028·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Bennett, Sr., seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to include a bankruptcy court order in the record on appeal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Bennett seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Bennett’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. Bay View Bank, 172 F. App'x 486 (4th Cir. 2006).

172 F. App'x 486 (Bennett v. Bay View Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)