Bennett v. Acton

30 N.E. 419, 130 Ind. 597, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 393
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 25, 1892
DocketNo. 15,612
StatusPublished

This text of 30 N.E. 419 (Bennett v. Acton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Acton, 30 N.E. 419, 130 Ind. 597, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 393 (Ind. 1892).

Opinion

Coffey, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellants to set aside certain alleged fraudulent conveyances. The only question involved in the case relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of the court..

We have read the evidence in the cause, and think there isevidence, both direct and circumstantial, from which the court was authorized to find that the conveyances in question were made and accepted for the fraudulent purpose of defeating the collection of the appellee’s claim. We can not, under the well known rules of this court, disturb the finding of the circuit court on the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 N.E. 419, 130 Ind. 597, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-acton-ind-1892.