Bennett v. Abdo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bennett v. Abdo

167 So. 3d 522, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9990, 2015 WL 4002373

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 2015

DocketNo. 5D14-3565

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 167 So. 3d 522 (Bennett v. Abdo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett v. Abdo, 167 So. 3d 522, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9990, 2015 WL 4002373 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Bennett appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for modification of an injunction for protection against domestic violence. In his motion, Bennett alleged that he is presently incarcerated and will be until December 2031, and the injunction is impacting his ability to participate in a work-release program. The trial court denied the motion without a hearing or explanation.

The trial court’s summary denial of Bennett’s motion was error. Bennett’s motion sufficiently alleged that circumstances had changed since the injunction was entered. See Raymonvil v. Lewis, 46 So.3d 139, 139-40 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Because Bennett’s motion was legally sufficient, the trial court was required to afford him a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

REVERSED and REMANDED for an evidentiary hearing.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI