Bennett Day Importing Co. v. Woodly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bennett Day Importing Co. v. Woodly

126 S.E. 926, 189 N.C. 827, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 409

DecidedFebruary 18, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 926 (Bennett Day Importing Co. v. Woodly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett Day Importing Co. v. Woodly, 126 S.E. 926, 189 N.C. 827, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 409 (N.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff sues for goods sold and delivered to the defendant and recovers. The defendant sets up a counterclaim asking damages for breach of warranty in the sale of said goods, and loses on his counterclaim. The controversy, on trial, narrowed itself to an issue of fact, which the jury alone could determine. The record presents no reversible error. The judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff sues for goods sold and delivered to the defendant and recovers. The defendant sets up a counterclaim asking damages for breach of warranty in the sale of said goods, and loses on his counterclaim. The controversy, on trial, narrowed itself to an issue of fact, which the jury alone could determine. The record presents no reversible error. The judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 S.E. 926, 189 N.C. 827, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-day-importing-co-v-woodly-nc-1925.