Bennett Box & Pallet Co.

Court of Claims

Bennett Box & Pallet Co.

618 F.2d 123, 221 Ct. Cl. 841, 1979 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 226

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedAugust 10, 1979

DocketNos. 617-71, 383-72, 413-73

StatusPublished

This text of 618 F.2d 123 (Bennett Box & Pallet Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett Box & Pallet Co., 618 F.2d 123, 221 Ct. Cl. 841, 1979 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 226 (cc 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Renegotiation of contracts; redetermination of excessive profits. — On September 29, 1978, 218 Ct.Cl. 636, the court entered an order stating that interlocutory review of a procedural order of the trial judge was not justified at that time, denying, without prejudice, defendant’s motion for prompt review of the procedural order, and remanding the consolidated cases to the trial judge. On August 10, 1979 the court issued an order, following filing of the parties’ stipulation, entering judgment against plaintiff for excessive profits of $938,000, $177,000, and $60,000 for its fiscal years ended December 31, 1967, 1968 and 1969, respectively, from contracts subject to the Renegotiation Act, the final net amount due by plaintiff for all 3 years, after adjustment for appropriate state and federal tax credits and further adjustment for amounts previously paid, being $78,948, exclusive of interest which the parties have waived by stipulation. The court also dismissed defendant’s counterclaim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Renegotiation of contracts; redetermination of excessive profits. — On September 29, 1978, 218 Ct.Cl. 636, the court entered an order stating that interlocutory review of a procedural order of the trial judge was not justified at that time, denying, without prejudice, defendant’s motion for prompt review of the procedural order, and remanding the consolidated cases to the trial judge. On August 10, 1979 the court issued an order, following filing of the parties’ stipulation, entering judgment against plaintiff for excessive profits of $938,000, $177,000, and $60,000 for its fiscal years ended December 31, 1967, 1968 and 1969, respectively, from contracts subject to the Renegotiation Act, the final net amount due by plaintiff for all 3 years, after adjustment for appropriate state and federal tax credits and further adjustment for amounts previously paid, being $78,948, exclusive of interest which the parties have waived by stipulation. The court also dismissed defendant’s counterclaim.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

618 F.2d 123, 221 Ct. Cl. 841, 1979 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-box-pallet-co-cc-1979.