Bennett, Bishop, Herron & Holmes v. Board of County Commissioners

426 So. 2d 1260, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18620
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 1983·No. No. 82-1126·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner challenges the circuit court’s denial of its petition for certiorari. Petitioner had sought a special exception under the Sarasota County Zoning Code, which the Board of County Commissioners denied. Thereafter, it filed for certiorari review in the circuit court.

Petitioner filed a timely notice of appeal from the circuit court’s final order. We point out, however, that where, as here, full review of administrative action has been given in the circuit court as a matter of right, one appealing the circuit court’s judgment is not entitled to a second full review in the district court. City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla.1982). As such, we have treated petitioner’s appeal as a petition for a writ of common law certiorari, and we have limited our review to a determination of whether the circuit court afforded procedural due process and applied the correct law. We conclude that it did, and accordingly, we deny the petition.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett, Bishop, Herron & Holmes v. Board of County Commissioners, 426 So. 2d 1260, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18620 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

426 So. 2d 1260 (Bennett, Bishop, Herron & Holmes v. Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Irvine v. DUVAL COUNTY PLANNING COM'N
466 So. 2d 357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
City of Clearwater v. ONE 1980 PORSCHE 911 SC, VEHICLE ID 91A0140918
426 So. 2d 1260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)