Bennethum v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bennethum v. Bowers

21 A. 520, 141 Pa. 105, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1045

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 23, 1891

DocketNo. 333

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A. 520 (Bennethum v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennethum v. Bowers, 21 A. 520, 141 Pa. 105, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1045 (Pa. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We are unable to find error in the admission of the deeds referred to in the first and second assignments, or the record of the equity suit referred to in the third. The decree in the latter was in affirmance of the deed from Margaret Rightmyer to Catharine Bennethum. It was explanatory of that deed, and a part of the plaintiff’s title. With the death of Elizabeth Rightmyer and Margaret Bowers, the plaintiff was clearly entitled to recover. The case does not need elaboration.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We are unable to find error in the admission of the deeds referred to in the first and second assignments, or the record of the equity suit referred to in the third. The decree in the latter was in affirmance of the deed from Margaret Rightmyer to Catharine Bennethum. It was explanatory of that deed, and a part of the plaintiff’s title. With the death of Elizabeth Rightmyer and Margaret Bowers, the plaintiff was clearly entitled to recover. The case does not need elaboration.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A. 520, 141 Pa. 105, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennethum-v-bowers-pa-1891.