Bennet v. D. Smith & Phelps
15 Johns. 355
This text of 15 Johns. 355 (Bennet v. D. Smith & Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bennet v. D. Smith & Phelps, 15 Johns. 355 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1818).
Opinion
The case of Munn v. The Commission Company, (ante, p. 44.) is decisively against you in this point. We decided that a note made for the purpose of being discounted at an usurious interest, and indorsed for the accommodation of the maker, was void in its original formation.
Sherwood, contra, was stopped by the court.
The motion to set aside the nonsuit must be denied.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Germania Savings Bank v. Village of Suspension Bridge
26 N.Y.S. 98 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Claflin v. . Boorum
25 N.E. 360 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Ayer v. Tilden
81 Mass. 178 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1860)
Simpson v. . Fullenwider
34 N.C. 334 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1851)
Whitworth & Yancey v. Adams
5 Va. 333 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1827)
Jackson ex rel. Walsh v. Colden
4 Cow. 266 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 Johns. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennet-v-d-smith-phelps-nysupct-1818.