Benners v. Executors of Howard

1 N.C. 149
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 15, 1800
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 149 (Benners v. Executors of Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benners v. Executors of Howard, 1 N.C. 149 (N.C. Ct. App. 1800).

Opinion

By

the Court.

Where a promise is, to pay a sum of money, but no time is mentioned, it is due presently, and an action lies without any request—.But where, under the like circumstances, a promise is made, to deliver goods, or to do a collateral act, it is necessary that the party to whom it is to be done, should make a demand of the promiser before an action is brought. Though no express promise be made in the present case, the law implies that the borrower should restore in kind the thing borrowed, on request, or pay the value in damages; but, to maintain a suit for the latter, the request is indispensably necessary.

Judgment for the Defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benners-v-executors-of-howard-ncsuperct-1800.