Benners v. Executors of Howard

1 N.C. 149
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided March 15, 1800·Published

Opinion

By

the Court.

Where a promise is, to pay a sum of money, but no time is mentioned, it is due presently, and an action lies without any request—.But where, under the like circumstances, a promise is made, to deliver goods, or to do a collateral act, it is necessary that the party to whom it is to be done, should make a demand of the promiser before an action is brought. Though no express promise be made in the present case, the law implies that the borrower should restore in kind the thing borrowed, on request, or pay the value in damages; but, to maintain a suit for the latter, the request is indispensably necessary.

Judgment for the Defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benners v. Executors of Howard, 1 N.C. 149 (N.C. Ct. App. 1800).

1 N.C. 149 (Benners v. Executors of Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.