Bennerd James Craig v. United States

293 F.2d 272
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 1961
Docket6779
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 F.2d 272 (Bennerd James Craig v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennerd James Craig v. United States, 293 F.2d 272 (10th Cir. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying the petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus which the trial court treated as a proceeding to vacate a judgment and sentence under Title 28 U.S. C.A. § 2255. The appellant was charged in a 3-count indictment with violations of the federal statutes relating to narcotic drugs. Upon a plea of guilty, he was sentenced to serve consecutive sentences on two counts, although the violations of the different statutory provisions resulted from the same acts. He contends that, under these circumstances, there could be a valid sentence on only one count.

The case of Gore v. United States, 357 U.S. 386, 78 S.Ct. 1280, 2 L.Ed.2d 1405, controls the question here, and we have on two previous occasions followed the Gore decision. Smith v. United States, 10 Cir., 273 F.2d 462, certiorari denied 363 U.S. 846, 80 S.Ct. 1619, 4 L.Ed.2d 1729; Richardson v. United States, 10 Cir., 285 F.2d 751, certiorari denied 365 U.S. 854, 81 S.Ct. 821, 5 L.Ed.2d 818. See also Harris v. United States, 359 U.S. 19, 79 S.Ct. 560, 3 L.Ed.2d 597.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ned Wood v. United States
317 F.2d 736 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 F.2d 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennerd-james-craig-v-united-states-ca10-1961.