Benn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Benn v. State

554 S.W.3d 463

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 2018

DocketWD 80307

StatusPublished

This text of 554 S.W.3d 463 (Benn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benn v. State, 554 S.W.3d 463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mitchel Benn appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek suppression of Benn's statement to Stephanie Kissick, a children's service worker with the Carroll County Children's Division, and for failing to object to Kissick's testimony about his statement to her. Finding no clear error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mitchel Benn appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek suppression of Benn's statement to Stephanie Kissick, a children's service worker with the Carroll County Children's Division, and for failing to object to Kissick's testimony about his statement to her. Finding no clear error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

554 S.W.3d 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benn-v-state-moctapp-2018.