Benn v. Greiner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benn v. Greiner

305 A.D.2d 497, 759 N.Y.S.2d 331

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 497 (Benn v. Greiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benn v. Greiner, 305 A.D.2d 497, 759 N.Y.S.2d 331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility, dated April 17, 2002, which affirmed a determination of a Hearing Officer, dated April 10, 2002, made after a Tier II disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating institutional rules, and imposing a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

[498]*498Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, the determination that he violated three institutional rules is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Abdur-Raheem v Mann, 85 NY2d 113 [1995]; Matter of Bryant v Coughlin, 77 NY2d 642 [1991]; Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964 [1990]; Matter of James v Strack, 214 AD2d 674 [1995]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility, dated April 17, 2002, which affirmed a determination of a Hearing Officer, dated April 10, 2002, made after a Tier II disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating institutional rules, and imposing a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

[498]*498Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, the determination that he violated three institutional rules is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Abdur-Raheem v Mann, 85 NY2d 113 [1995]; Matter of Bryant v Coughlin, 77 NY2d 642 [1991]; Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964 [1990]; Matter of James v Strack, 214 AD2d 674 [1995]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 497, 759 N.Y.S.2d 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benn-v-greiner-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack