Benlock v. New Haven Terminal

706 A.2d 1390, 48 Conn. App. 250, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 115
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided March 24, 1998·No. AC 17178·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner, who found that the plaintiffs myocardial infarction was a compensable injury. The defendants’ counsel on appeal was also trial counsel, and this appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedure are involved and to discuss the defendants’ claims would serve no useful purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976); Lord v. Lord, 44 Conn. App. 370, 376, 689 A.2d 509, cert. denied, 241 Conn. 913, 696 A.2d 985 (1997).

The decision of the compensation review board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benlock v. New Haven Terminal, 706 A.2d 1390, 48 Conn. App. 250, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 115 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

706 A.2d 1390 (Benlock v. New Haven Terminal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fritz v. Zoning Board of Appeals
732 A.2d 826 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1999)
Benlock v. New Haven Terminal
717 A.2d 231 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)
Zoning Inspector v. Plunske
706 A.2d 1391 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)