Benlock v. New Haven Terminal

Connecticut Appellate Court

Benlock v. New Haven Terminal

706 A.2d 1390, 48 Conn. App. 250, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 115

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMarch 24, 1998

DocketAC 17178

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 706 A.2d 1390 (Benlock v. New Haven Terminal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benlock v. New Haven Terminal, 706 A.2d 1390, 48 Conn. App. 250, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 115 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner, who found that the plaintiffs myocardial infarction was a compensable injury. The defendants’ counsel on appeal was also trial counsel, and this appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedure are involved and to discuss the defendants’ claims would serve no useful purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976); Lord v. Lord, 44 Conn. App. 370, 376, 689 A.2d 509, cert. denied, 241 Conn. 913, 696 A.2d 985 (1997).

The decision of the compensation review board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner, who found that the plaintiffs myocardial infarction was a compensable injury. The defendants’ counsel on appeal was also trial counsel, and this appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedure are involved and to discuss the defendants’ claims would serve no useful purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976); Lord v. Lord, 44 Conn. App. 370, 376, 689 A.2d 509, cert. denied, 241 Conn. 913, 696 A.2d 985 (1997).

The decision of the compensation review board is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 A.2d 1390, 48 Conn. App. 250, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benlock-v-new-haven-terminal-connappct-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack