Benlian v. Vartabedian
This text of 96 Misc. 2d 63 (Benlian v. Vartabedian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order of the court below (see 91 Misc 2d 968) affirmed, without costs.
[64]*64While we disagree with the lower court’s finding that plaintiff was not entitled to the appointment of a receiver, nevertheless we agree with its determination denying the receiver’s motion to fix compensation, since special circumstances have not been shown to exist (East Chatham Corp. v Iacovone, 25 AD2d 622; CPLR 5228; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, pars 8004.06, 8004.09).
Concur: Pino, P. J., and Weinstein, J.; Thompson, J., taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 Misc. 2d 63, 409 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1978 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benlian-v-vartabedian-nyappterm-1978.