Benlian v. Vartabedian

96 Misc. 2d 63, 409 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1978 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2552
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 5, 1978·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order of the court below (see 91 Misc 2d 968) affirmed, without costs.

[64]*64While we disagree with the lower court’s finding that plaintiff was not entitled to the appointment of a receiver, nevertheless we agree with its determination denying the receiver’s motion to fix compensation, since special circumstances have not been shown to exist (East Chatham Corp. v Iacovone, 25 AD2d 622; CPLR 5228; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, pars 8004.06, 8004.09).

Concur: Pino, P. J., and Weinstein, J.; Thompson, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benlian v. Vartabedian, 96 Misc. 2d 63, 409 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1978 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

96 Misc. 2d 63 (Benlian v. Vartabedian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amusement Distributors, Inc. v. Oz Forum, Inc.
113 A.D.2d 855 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
In Re Studio 54 Disco, Inc.
21 B.R. 308 (E.D. New York, 1982)