Benkovitch v. Berger Singerman, P.A.

132 So. 3d 1235, 2014 WL 784890, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2588
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 2014·No. Nos. 3D13-988, 3D13-964, 3D13-965·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth Benkovitch, the defendant in proceedings supplementary, appeals from three orders in these consolidated cases. We affirm the order appealed in case number 3D13-964, denying Ms. Benkovitch’s amended motion to set aside a sheriffs sale and levy.

We dismiss the appeals from the two remaining orders, case numbers 3D13-965 and 3D13-988, as these are non-final, non-appealable orders. Machado v. Foreign Trade, Inc., 544 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Sverdahl v. Farmers & Merchants Sav. Bank, 582 So.2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Warren v. S.E. Leisure Sys., Inc., 522 So.2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benkovitch v. Berger Singerman, P.A., 132 So. 3d 1235, 2014 WL 784890, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2588 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

132 So. 3d 1235 (Benkovitch v. Berger Singerman, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warren v. SOUTHEASTERN LEISURE SYSTEMS
522 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
MacHado v. Foreign Trade, Inc.
544 So. 2d 1061 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Sverdahl v. Farmers & Merchants Sav. Bank
582 So. 2d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)