Benkovitch v. Berger Singerman, P.A.
This text of 132 So. 3d 1235 (Benkovitch v. Berger Singerman, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Elizabeth Benkovitch, the defendant in proceedings supplementary, appeals from three orders in these consolidated cases. We affirm the order appealed in case number 3D13-964, denying Ms. Benkovitch’s amended motion to set aside a sheriffs sale and levy.
We dismiss the appeals from the two remaining orders, case numbers 3D13-965 and 3D13-988, as these are non-final, non-appealable orders. Machado v. Foreign Trade, Inc., 544 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Sverdahl v. Farmers & Merchants Sav. Bank, 582 So.2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Warren v. S.E. Leisure Sys., Inc., 522 So.2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 So. 3d 1235, 2014 WL 784890, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benkovitch-v-berger-singerman-pa-fladistctapp-2014.