Benjuski v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benjuski v. Reid

58 A.D.2d 800, 395 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12961

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.2d 800 (Benjuski v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benjuski v. Reid, 58 A.D.2d 800, 395 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants Margaret and John Magno appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 28, 1976, which, after a jury trial, is in favor of plaintiff and against them and dismissed the complaint, and their cross claim, as against codefendant Reid. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents. The record fully supports the factual findings of the jury (see, generally, Sorokin v Food Fair Stores, 51 AD2d 592). In addition, we have examined appellants’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Latham, J. P., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants Margaret and John Magno appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 28, 1976, which, after a jury trial, is in favor of plaintiff and against them and dismissed the complaint, and their cross claim, as against codefendant Reid. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents. The record fully supports the factual findings of the jury (see, generally, Sorokin v Food Fair Stores, 51 AD2d 592). In addition, we have examined appellants’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Latham, J. P., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 800, 395 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjuski-v-reid-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack