Benjamin v. Pardue
This text of 162 S.E. 291 (Benjamin v. Pardue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. An order sustaining a demurrer to a defendant’s plea . and striking the plea is not a final judgment. Where no final judgment is excepted to, an exception to an order sustaining a demurrer to the defendant’s plea to the jurisdiction and striking the plea can not be entertained by this court. Bolton v. White, 43 Ga. App. 13 (158 S. E. 436).
2. A bill of exceptions lies to an order overruling a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s case, since an order sustaining- the motion would be a final disposition of the case. Civil Code (1910), § 6138.
3. A contract made by a minor is not void, but is voidable only. It is therefore no ground for the dismissal of an attachment that the surety upon the attachment bond executed by the plaintiff in attachment was a minor. The defendant’s remedy is to contest the sufficiency of the bond, as provided in section 5062 of the Civil Code of 1910, by requiring the ' plaintiff in attachment to give additional security or a new bond, in default of which the attachment will be dismissed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 S.E. 291, 44 Ga. App. 587, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjamin-v-pardue-gactapp-1932.