Benjamin v. Kurnick
141 A. 919, 104 N.J.L. 648, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 276
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Paekee, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — -None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benjamin v. Kurnick, 141 A. 919, 104 N.J.L. 648, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 276 (N.J. 1928).
141 A. 919 (Benjamin v. Kurnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.