Benjamin v. Junior

271 So. 3d 151
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 2019
Docket19-0737
StatusPublished

This text of 271 So. 3d 151 (Benjamin v. Junior) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benjamin v. Junior, 271 So. 3d 151 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 18, 2019.

________________

No. 3D19-737 Lower Tribunal No. 18-10746 ________________

Terrance Benjamin, Petitioner,

vs.

Daniel Junior, etc., et al., Respondents.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction -- Habeas Corpus

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent The State of Florida.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM. UPON CONFESSION OF ERROR

Petitioner, Terrance Benjamin, seeks a writ of habeas corpus, challenging his

pretrial detention. Petitioner was charged with failure to return a hired vehicle, a

third-degree felony. See § 817.52(3), Fla. Stat. (2018). The trial court ordered

petitioner held without bond following a failure to appear for jury trial.

Petitioner argues the trial court failed to make a finding that his failure to

appear was willful and that “no conditions of release can reasonably protect the

community from risk of physical harm to persons, assure the presence of the accused

at trial, or assure the integrity of the judicial process.” State v. Blair, 39 So. 3d 1190,

1192 (Fla. 2010) (quoting art. I, § 14, Fla. Const.); see Williams v. State, 68 So. 3d

1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). The State, properly and commendably, concedes error.

See § 907.041, Fla. Stat. (2018); State v. Paul, 783 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 2001).

Accordingly, we grant the petition and direct the trial court to release

petitioner with reasonable conditions. This opinion should not be read to limit the

ability of the trial court to take additional evidence or impose ancillary conditions

on pretrial release.

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Paul
783 So. 2d 1042 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Williams v. State
68 So. 3d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Blair
39 So. 3d 1190 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 So. 3d 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjamin-v-junior-fladistctapp-2019.