Benjamin v. Faro
1 A.D.2d 948, 150 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 1956·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The liability of the appellant and defendant Giarizzo is a consolidated or unified one under section 211-a of the Civil Practice Act (Martindale v. Griffin, 233 App. Div. 510, affd. 259 N. Y. 530). For the purposes of contribution — within the meaning of section 211-a — they are jointly and severally liable for the portion of the judgment allocable to the entity they comprise. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benjamin v. Faro, 1 A.D.2d 948, 150 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).
1 A.D.2d 948 (Benjamin v. Faro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mead v. Bloom
94 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. Baker
217 N.W.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1974)