Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Benjamin v. Faro

Benjamin v. Faro

1 A.D.2d 948, 150 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 24, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 A.D.2d 948 (Benjamin v. Faro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benjamin v. Faro, 1 A.D.2d 948, 150 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

The liability of the appellant and defendant Giarizzo is a consolidated or unified one under section 211-a of the Civil Practice Act (Martindale v. Griffin, 233 App. Div. 510, affd. 259 N. Y. 530). For the purposes of contribution — within the meaning of section 211-a — they are jointly and severally liable for the portion of the judgment allocable to the entity they comprise. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mead v. Bloom
94 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. Baker
217 N.W.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 948, 150 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjamin-v-faro-nyappdiv-1956.