Benjamin v. Davis

6 La. Ann. 472
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 La. Ann. 472 (Benjamin v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benjamin v. Davis, 6 La. Ann. 472 (La. 1851).

Opinion

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Rost, J.

The motion to dismiss in this case, is not, in our opinion, tenable. The error of the judge in fixing the return day cannot, under the act of 1839, prejudice the plaintiff, and it was sufficient to file the record on the return day fixed by the act of 1850.

The act charged against the defendants is satisfactorily proved, and they have failed to show the necessity which could alone have justified it. Armed, and prepared as they were, the shooting with ball or buck-shot was totally unjustifiable. The verdict of the jury is clearly erroneous, and the judgment must be reversed'. Bell v. Hebert, 3d Ann. 132. Carmouche v. Bouis, ante, p. 95.

It is therefore ordered, that the judgment in this case be reversed. It is further ordered, that the plaintiff recover from the defendants, in solido, $350, with legal interest, from the 27th October, 1847, till paid, and costs in both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Treadaway
52 So. 500 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 La. Ann. 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjamin-v-davis-la-1851.