Benjamin v. Brownstein

79 Misc. 84, 139 N.Y.S. 318
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Upon an appeal to this court from an order made at a Special Term of the City Court granting or denying a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, only ten dollars costs and disbursements are allowable. Brennan v. Joline, 70 Misc. Rep. 537. Disbursements are not taxable unless so specified in the order. Wilson v. Lange, 84 N. Y. Supp. 519. The omission in the order of this court to grant the plaintiffs ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the affirmance of the order granting a new trial in the City Court upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, was evidently an oversight, and the plaintiffs should have applied for a re-settlement of the order. Unless the defendants will stipulate that the plaintiffs may tax ten dollars costs and their disbursements, a motion to re-settle the order will be entertained. As the case now stands, however, the order appealed from must be reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the item of twenty dollars before argument, forty dollars for argument and forty-eight dollars and thirty-eight cents disbursements, stricken from the bill of costs allowed in the lower court as appeal costs, etc.

Present: Seabuky, Lehman and Page, JJ.

Order reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benjamin v. Brownstein, 79 Misc. 84, 139 N.Y.S. 318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

79 Misc. 84 (Benjamin v. Brownstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paoli v. East River National Bank
90 Misc. 645 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Benjamin v. Brownstein
148 N.Y.S. 1105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)