Benjamin Scott Zertuche v. Chelsea Wessels, CRS Healthcare, LLC, and Joey Urrabazo
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
JUDGMENT No. 04-18-00429-CV
Benjamin Scott ZERTUCHE, Appellant
v.
Chelsae WESSELS and Joey Urrabazo, Appellees
From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas Trial Court No. 13-10-0938-CVA Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding
BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA
In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Chelsae Wessels’s assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and loss of consortium claims that are based on the pregnancy and abortion facts alleged primarily in paragraphs 24–39 of Defendants’ First Amended Answer to Third Amended Third Party Petition and Counterclaim.
We DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Joey Urrabazo’s intentional infliction of emotional distress and loss of consortium claims that are based on the pregnancy and abortion facts alleged primarily in paragraphs 24–39 of Defendants’ First Amended Answer to Third Amended Third Party Petition and Counterclaim.
We REMAND this cause to the trial court to award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of court incurred for the dismissed claims only, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
SIGNED November 14, 2018.
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benjamin Scott Zertuche v. Chelsea Wessels, CRS Healthcare, LLC, and Joey Urrabazo (Benjamin Scott Zertuche v. Chelsea Wessels, CRS Healthcare, LLC, and Joey Urrabazo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.